From Test Result to Finding in 5 Minutes: How AI Drafts Audit Findings
Learn how AI transforms raw test results into professional audit findings in minutes, not hours. See the workflow that's changing how CPA firms deliver internal audit.
Every internal auditor knows the pain: you’ve completed testing, identified exceptions, and now comes the tedious work of writing it all up. Drafting findings is time-consuming, and the quality varies depending on who writes them.
What if that process took 5 minutes instead of 50?
The Traditional Findings Workflow
Here’s how most CPA firms draft internal audit findings today:
- Complete testing: Identify exceptions through control testing
- Gather evidence: Collect supporting documentation
- Draft condition: Describe what you found
- Document criteria: What should have happened
- Analyze cause: Why did the control fail?
- Assess effect: What’s the impact?
- Recommend action: What should the client do?
- Review and refine: Senior review, edits, finalization
This process takes 30-60 minutes per finding—sometimes longer for complex issues. Multiply by a dozen findings per engagement, and you’re looking at days of writing time.
How AI Changes the Equation
AI-assisted findings drafting flips the workflow:
- Complete testing: Same as before
- AI drafts finding: Condition, criteria, cause, effect, recommendation
- Auditor reviews: Refine language, add judgment
- Done: Professional finding ready for the report
The AI handles the first draft—the blank-page problem that slows everyone down. You focus on refinement and professional judgment.
What AI-Drafted Findings Look Like
When you run control testing through Torvia, the AI has context:
- Test objective: What control was being tested
- Test procedure: How testing was performed
- Test result: Pass, fail, or exception details
- Evidence reviewed: Documents analyzed
From this context, the AI drafts a finding like:
Finding: Incomplete Access Review Documentation
Condition: During testing of quarterly access reviews for the financial reporting system, 3 of 25 sampled reviews (12%) lacked documented approval from the system owner. Reviews were completed but approval evidence was missing from the access management system.
Criteria: Per the Access Control Policy (IT-AC-003), all quarterly access reviews require documented approval by the designated system owner within 5 business days of review completion.
Cause: The access management workflow does not enforce approval capture before marking reviews complete. System owners are able to acknowledge review results without recording formal approval.
Effect: Without documented approval, there is no evidence that access reviews were authorized by appropriate personnel. This creates compliance risk for SOC 2 attestation and potential control gaps if unauthorized access was inadvertently approved.
Recommendation: Modify the access management workflow to require system owner approval before reviews can be marked complete. Implement automated reminders for pending approvals exceeding 3 business days.
This draft is ready for refinement—not a starting point from scratch.
The Auditor’s Role
AI doesn’t replace auditor judgment. It handles the structured work so you can focus on:
- Root cause analysis: Is the AI’s cause assessment accurate? Is there a deeper issue?
- Impact assessment: How material is this finding? Does severity need adjustment?
- Recommendation quality: Is the recommendation practical for this client?
- Client context: Are there factors the AI doesn’t know about?
The finding gets better because you’re editing a draft, not writing from nothing.
Source Linking: The Transparency Layer
Every AI-drafted finding includes source context:
- Which documents were analyzed
- Which test results informed the finding
- Confidence level in the analysis
This transparency matters for:
- Senior review: Verify the AI’s work has proper support
- Client discussions: Point to specific evidence when presenting findings
- Workpaper quality: Documentation of AI-assisted methodology
Time Savings in Practice
CPA firms using AI-assisted findings drafting report:
| Metric | Before AI | With AI | Improvement |
|---|---|---|---|
| Time per finding | 45 min | 8 min | 82% faster |
| Findings per day | 6-8 | 25-30 | 3-4x throughput |
| Review cycles | 2-3 | 1-2 | 30% fewer |
The math is compelling: what took a full day now takes a few hours.
Getting Started
To leverage AI-drafted findings:
- Run control testing through the platform: AI needs test context
- Review AI drafts: Accept, modify, or regenerate
- Refine with judgment: Add client-specific context
- Export to your report format: Professional deliverable ready
The workflow integrates with how you already work—just faster.
Related Reading
- AI-Powered Internal Audit: Why CPA Firms Are Leading the Way — The strategic case for AI in your practice
- AI Audit Trails: How to Explain AI Decisions — Documenting AI-assisted methodology
Ready to draft findings in minutes? Request a demo and see AI-assisted findings drafting in action.